Interpersonal Communication between Husband and Wife on an Argument
(An Analysis of Genderlect Style and Relational Dialectics)
by Enrica Maria Corazon A. Edralin
COMA 101
Prof. Antonino Salvador S. de Veyra
March, 27, 2008
Interpersonal communication is an art of projecting oneself to another. It conveys a message from the doer to the receiver. It is an art because to have effective communication one needs to be skillful in handling the receiver. However, interpretation of the message is subjective. Its medium can be verbal or nonverbal. Both media of communication are vital in a growing and healthy relationship. Using words to translate one’s emotions, ideas and feelings belong to the verbal communication while nonverbal uses actions to relate with others. In marriage, the husband and wife interact mostly in a casual manner. They are in their unguarded moments interacting with another while talking. The use of words can be a source of conflict between husband and wife. It is hoped that this study can help the married couple enjoy conversing to each other.
Gender has a vital role in verbal communication and must be considered for any relationship.
Below is an example of husband and wife conversing to each other.
WIFE: Salamat na uli ka na! Na-unsa man ka nga dugay ka man na-abot. Unsa
na gud karong
orasa?
HUSBAND: Nag-overtime!
WIFE: Ga-overtime?! Kahibalo ka nga
na-a koy importante na prayer meeting nga tambungan karon dugay-dugay pa jud kag
uli. Naay special guest namo didto.
HUSBAND: Pakan-a usa ko!
WIFE: Ga-agpas lagi ko kay naa special guest sa prayer
meeting. Andam naman nang lamesa. May kan-on ug sud-an.
HUSBAND: Dungan ta ug kaon.
WIFE: Ay! Didto na lang ko
mukaon sa prayer meeting. Mag-una nalang ko kay late na ko.. Naa gud
ko lakton, ikaw na lang diha, wa bitaw na naku dalha ang plato up pagkaon.
HUSBAND: Lingkod dri, naa ko gusto i-sulti sa imo.
WIFE: Unsa man na? Puede pag-uli na lang naku. Maayo pa
ihatod usa ko.HUSBAND: Daghan na gani problema sa opisina, ipahatud pa jud ta.
WIFE: Ayaw dalha ang trabaho diri sa balay. Ikaw na lang kaon diha. Dili diay ko nimu mahatod? Maayo gali …(interrupted)
HUSBAND: Ayaw nag lakaw! Ubani ko nga mukaon!
The above is conflict between the wife and the husband. Coming home late of a husband saddened the wife. As a result, the wife was angry because her husband had disrupted her schedule. She had looked forward to be with her group. The husband in return, got mad because he had just arrived yet his wife was in a hurry to leave. However, this conflict can be simple when the concerned accept that they are different in gender and can complement each other. The Genderlect Style of Deborah Tannen explains how the husband and wife differ on the manner they communicate.
These are:
Connection and Status.
Men are basically the breadwinner of the family. He is the one whom the wife depends for support in a natural scenario of man-woman relationship. Because of this dependence, man is supposed to be of superior race. Often he seeks for status. The woman being dependent to the man seeks connection. Status and connection are the underlying behavioral drives in man and woman differences.
In the above conflict, the wife wanted so much to attend the prayer meeting, she waited for her husband. She expressed her desire in a sarcastic manner of several questions. The husband is more concerned to be with his wife. He wanted to update his wife with his work and establish his need to be with
Emotion and Rapport.
Men avoid the show of emotions and tangibles are possibly eliminated. These make them weak when they seek for status. They need to have definite and verifiable facts. They regard emotion as indicator of being weak. They resort to emotion when men perceive they are free from ridicule and from further talk. They do not want to be interrupted when they talk. They present themselves to be objective and authoritative or as an expert to be above of others, to be followed.
Women prefer resorts to the use of intensifiers as they describe their feelings, relationships and people. In their quest to be in harmony, to clarify their issues so she can establish rapport and connections, she tends to talk more.
The above scenario on the husband and wife talking, it is clear that the wife has more number of words than the man. She prefers to be with her spiritual group but the husband enforces his status for her to stay.
Private and public.
Women resort to talking to gain rapport and connection with others and they indulge more in private conversation. Individual relationship is curtailed in public speaking, so women may talk less. They may also be overshadowed by men.
In the above conversation, the wife prefers the informal group in a prayer meeting to have social group. Prayer meeting can be a vehicle for more talks, and feelings are outpoured in prayers. The husband prefers to hold on to his table. This could be boring to his wife, but to avoid conflict, the wife must give in to the dominant characteristic of the husband.
Listening and interrupting.
As woman needs to connect, she tries to perceive the message to find connectors, linkages to connect better to others. They will listen to be in accord to the situation of the other. They can sustain their listening skill. They do not interrupt even for a long period of time, where they exhibit careful attention to the speaker. They interrupt when they need to have more information and possibly support the issue.
However, men interrupt to demonstrate status. It is a tool for power play to gain control of the situation. In a business meeting, where men outnumbered the women, the members allow the boss to question, as an ego booster. The members avoid asking questions, for they in turn expose themselves to follow-up questions from the boss.
As shown in the above example, the husband interrupted his wife and insists that she stays is a power play.
Conflict.
As women desire to have rapport, as much as possible conflict has to be avoided. Conflict can disrupt connections and even could reduce them.
But for men, conflict is a tool to short cut in gaining and holding status. A snappy, spur of the moment fight, sharp as it seems quickly give them the higher rank they have on women.
The husband in the above cited situation has maintained his rank. He imposes on his wife to status.
In his book, Men, Women and Relationships: Making peace with the opposite sex, John Gray cited the main biological reason why men and women differ in resolving conflict.
The increase male resistance is related to very important difference between men and women. Women have more corpus callosum in their brains. This is the connective tissue that joins the left and right hemispheres of the brain. Recent discoveries have revealed that because women have more corpus callosum, they are able to access more quickly in more readily different parts of the brain. This makes women more flexible to shift goals in midstream.
Contradiction is formed whenever two tendencies on forces are interdependent (Griffin, 2006). This is explained on the Relational Dialectics theory of Baxter and Montgomery. These are connectedness and separateness, certainty and uncertainty, openness and closeness:
“Connectedness and Separateness.
In a relationship there is a need to balance between connectedness and separateness. You need your space but at the same time you have the urge to want to spend time together and To be with each other, whatever the reasons are to be together can be as rewarding as when one spend time and give space to formulate and recharge one’s competence by being alone. If there is an imbalance in the relationship between oneself and being with another, the relationship will ultimately suffer.
“Certainty and Uncertainty.
Spontaneity is an element present in all relationships. There is a need to have freedom from insecurity. If everything is strictly predictable in a relationship, the parties seemed to lose interest. Although simultaneously there is an element of suspense, there also has to be some predictability otherwise the amount of uncertainty in the relationship surge up to a dangerous level.
“Openness and Closeness
Throughout all relationships, privacy and openness is like on a wheel. Openness assures the other party to feel involved. It also give security to the other that uncertainties are reduced to the minimum level. Much is a danger in disclosing information. Timeliness of releasing information give is an important factor in openness. Otherwise, information that are released too early may lose its importance. The balance of openness and closeness can make a healthy relationship of wonder and reduced apprehension.
In a relationship there is need to connect and also to separate. The wife wanted to have time with her prayer group. She is giving space towards her relationship with her husband by being with others. The husband on the other hand wanted to spend time with her wife. He wanted to dine and talk to her. The conflict starts because both have different and contrasting wants. The wife might have deserted the desire of her husband to have time for each other. The husband might have also done the same when he demanded that his wife must stay home to be with him. Both the husband and the wife must know that they both have responsibilities as a couple and as individuals. Too much self-disclosure made the husband demand to make her wife stay at home. He thought it would help stop the argument. However, this kind of response is unhealthy for their relationship.
The attention of a man is diverted to enforce being right and forgets to be affectionate when he seemed to be challenged. He becomes harsh and his sound is loud. Men rarely say “I’m sorry”, saying sorry means you have done something wrong and you are apologizing. Most arguments escalate when a man begins to invalidate a woman’s feelings and she responds to him disapproving. The most common way a woman unknowingly starts arguments is by not being direct when they share their feelings. Men are most prone to argue when they have made a mistake or upset the woman they love
Gray, J.,Ph.D. listed on his book, Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus the ways to cover up real feelings¸ the process is generally unconscious.
How men hide their pain this process is generally unconscious
How men hide their pain this process is generally unconscious
1. Men may use anger as a way of avoiding the painful feelings of sadness, hurt, sorrow, guild and fear.
2. Men may use indifference and discouragement as a way of avoiding the painful feelings of anger.
3. Men may use feeling offended as a way of avoiding feeling hurt.
4. Men may use anger and righteousness as a way to avoid feeling afraid or uncertain.
5. Men may feel ashamed to avid anger and grieving.
The secret reasons men are arguing what he needs not to argue
1) “I don’t like it when she gets upset over the smallest things I do or don’t do. I feel criticized. Rejected and unaccepted.”
1) He needs to feel accepted just they way he is. Instead he feels she is trying to improve him.
2) “I don’t like it when she started telling how I should do things. I don’t feel admired. Instead I feel like I am being treated like a child.”
2) He needs to feel admired. Instead he feels put down.
3) “I don’t like it when she blames me for her unhappiness. I don’t feel encouraged to be her knight in shining armor.”
3) He needs to feel encouraged, instead he feels like giving up.
4) “I don’t like it when she complaints about how much she does or how unappreciated she feels. It makes me feel unappreciated for the things I do for her.”
4) He needs to feel appreciated. Instead he feels blamed, unacknowledged, and powerless.
5) “I don’t like it when she worries about everything that could go wrong. I don’t feel trusted.
5) He needs to feel trusted and appreciated for his contribution to her security. Instead he feels responsible for her anxiety.
6) “I don’t like it when she expects me to do things or talk when she want me to. I don’t feel accepted or respected.”
6) He needs to feel accepted just the way he is. Instead he feels controlled or pressured to talk and thus has nothing to say. It makes me feel that he can never satisfy her.
7) “I don’t like it when she feels hurt by what I say. I feel mistrusted, misunderstood, and pushed away.”
7) He needs to feel accepted and trusted. Instead he feels rejected and unforgotten.
8) “I don’t like it when she expects me to read her mind. I can’t. It makes me feel bad or inadequate.
8) He needs to feel approved of and accepted. Instead he feels like a failure.
How women hide their pain this process is generally unconscious
1. Women may use concern and worry as away of avoiding the painful feelings of anger, guilt, fear, and disappointment.
2. Women may fall into confusion as away of avoiding anger, irritation and frustration.
3. Women may use feeling bad as a way of avoiding embarrassment, anger, sadness, and regret.
4. Women may use fear and uncertainty as away of avoiding anger, hurt, and sadness.
5. Women may use grieving to avoid feeling, anger, and afraid.
The woman can start and can escalate conflict. She first presents ill feelings, negative attitudes about their partner’s actions and then by giving unsolicited advice. She exhibits mistrust and unknowingly how her mistrust has hurt him.
Gray, J.,Ph.D. listed on the same book, Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus the implicatures of the statements in both men and women when arguing.
The secret reasons why women argue what she needs not to argue
1. “I don’t like it when he minimizes the importance of my feelings or requests. I feel dismissed and unimportant.”
1. She needs to feel validated and cherished. Instead she feels judged and ignored.
2. “I don’t like it when he forgets to do the things I ask, and then I sound like a nag. I feel like I am begging for his support.”
2. She needs to feel respected and remembered. Instead she feels neglected and at the bottom of his list of priorities.
3. “I don’t feel like it when he blames me for being upset. I feel like I have to be perfect to be loved. I am not perfect.
3. She needs him to understand why she’s is still loved and that she doesn’t have to be perfect. Instead she feels unsafe to be herself.
4. “I don’t like it when he raises his voice or starts making lists of why he is right. It makes me feel like I am wrong and he doesn’t care about my point of view.”
4. She needs to feel understood and respected. Instead she feels unheard, bullied, and pushed down.
5. “I didn’t like his codescending attitude when I ask questions about decisions we need to make. It makes me feel like I am a burden or that I am wasting his time.”
5. She needs to feel that he cares about her feelings and resects her need to gather information. Instead she feels disrespected and unappreciated.
When there are conflicts, there must also be ways for good interpersonal communication (Basilio, 2006). This helps to clarify the importance of interpersonal communication just as the idea of Baxter and Montgomery on Relational dialectics.
Communication with its five areas to focus:
a. Listening. Good listening takes concentration, patience, sensitivity, and freedom from wondering of what each other is thinking.
b. Speaking. Double meaning should be avoided in talking. No is perfectly negative and yes is as perfectly positive, as well. Avoid generalized accusation as in the use of the word ALWAYS or verbal manipulation with term FEEL LIKE. False assumption that the message is understood must never be taken for granted. The idea must be stressed to convey the real meaning. But never to nag.
c. Encouraging. The partner will respond positively when affirmation, appreciation, encouragement are given and done honestly.
d. Confronting. Tact is essential in love. When wrong attitudes are very clear and evident, the more a secure relationship is needed. Accountability must be coupled of being prepared to be confronted.
Above all these theories of communication and differences, it is subjective on how each partner should be able to interrelate oneself to the other. Pointing out the differences is not to excuse the husband and the wife, but to free the partners of taking their respective reactions negatively. With the absence of this knowledge of the differences, even with the best motives and intentions we can worsen the situation.
Mindful to each other’s differences, one should never judge the other as less than oneself. There should always be the desire to connect. It is through understanding on how to mend and reach out the other that makes communication an essential factor in interpersonal relationship. To be discreet and proper, choice of words must be a habit and not just that it happens.
Works Cited
Asborn, S & Moley M.T. Improving Communication. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mufflin c1999.
Booth, David, B. Cameron, Pat Lashman. Talk, Look and Listen. Toronto: Globe/Modern Curriculum Press, c1986.
Burgon, Michael. Communication Yearbook 6. New York: Sage Pub., c1982
Craig, R.J. Social Approaches to Communication ed by Wendy Leeds-Humity: New York: Guiford Press, c1995.
Flotz, Roy G. Management by Communication. Pennsylvania: Chilton Book Co., c1973.
Gray, John. Men, and Relationships: Making Peace with the Opposite Sex, Hillsborg, Or: Beyond Words. Pub, c1990
Gray, John., Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, a Practical Guide for Improving Communication and Getting What You Want in Your Relationships. 1st ed., New York, N4: Hayer Collins, c1992.
Griffin.E. A First Look at Communication Theory . Mc Graw-Hill Companies, Inc., NY c2006
Pace, R. W, Peterson B.D, & Radcliffe T.R,. Comp: Communicating Interpersonally: a Reader. Columbus, Ohio: Merril, c1973.
Robin, C.L. Equal Partners – Good Friends; Empowering Couples Through Therapy. London; New York. Reutledge, c1996.
Shames G.H & Wilg E.H., Human Communication Disorders: An Introduction ed. 2nd ed. Columbus: CE Merril Pub, Co., c1986.
Tubbs, S.L. & Moss, S., Human Communication 6th ed. New York: Mc Grawhill, c1991
Watt, J.H. & Vanlear C. A. Dynamic Patterns in Communication Processes. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publication, c1996.
Webster, Frank. Theories of the Information Society. London and New York: Routledge, c1995
Newpaper Clippings:
Torrento, J.M “Communication: “Breath of Life” to Marriage”.. The Mindanao Daily Mirror. Friday, April 26, 2002
Basilio, A.T F. “Ingredients for Good Relationships”. The Mindanao Daily Mirror. Wednesday, May 24, 2006
Internet
Genderlect Style. Changing minds org. c2002-2007. March 24, 2008
Interpersonal Communication. Herington. Ethnology. March 24 2008
Relational Dialectics. Tony Cooke. Ohio Edu. March 25, 2008